2 Comments

The Day – Post-apocalyptic action from Douglas Aarniokoski

Image is not the property of Entertainment Maven

I wanted to like Douglas Aarniokoski’s The Day, I really did. The stills looked awesome. The action promised to take place almost solely at an abandoned farm house, and regular readers will know that I absolutely LOVE films that use a single location effectively. The film also had a few big names in the cast and an all Canadian crew, what’s not to like? Quite a bit, it turns out. The Day is a generic post-apocalyptic film that holds its cards very close to the chest until the final scenes, at which point it is too little too late.

SPOILERS

The film tells the story of a group of five survivors (Shawn Ashmore, Ashley Bell, Cory Hardrict, Dominic Monaghan and Shannyn Sossamon) on the run from an unknown enemy. The earth they traverse is a dead world that doesn’t even seem to be populated by small furry animals any longer, let alone other human beings. An illness of one of the survivors forces the group to take refuge in a desolate farm house for the night. Internal conflicts begin to eat at the group from the inside, while a siege of the farmhouse threatens to destroy them from the outside. Unfortunately, this interesting premise turned into an exercise in patience, as I waited for the group of survivors to die and the credits to roll.

I feel bad being hard on this film because it was clearly a labour of love for some, director Aarniokoski for example, but was not taken nearly as seriously by others, Shannyn Sossamon and writer Luke Passmore in particular. The acting in The Day was inconsistent throughout the entire film. What I’m sure was supposed to be the lack of hope that comes with a post-apocalyptic world, came across as an absurd calm in the actors that was comical at times. Sossamon’s lines in particular sounded like they were from a screen test. She should have just joined the rest of the cast and crew via Skype during filming, I’m sure it would have been just as effective. However, the real culprit behind the ineffectiveness of The Day was the script.

The intriguing set up and ingenious trap at the beginning of the film are completely wasted, as the script completely falls apart when the central characters must meaningfully interact. Relationships and allegiances change at the drop of a dime, profanity is exchanged to simply fill the silence, there are an inordinate number of pointy sticks used as weapons in the film, and the token black guy delivers stereotypical lines. However, these aren’t even the most enraging aspects of the script.

Ammo conservation is a constant topic between the characters, after all, where are they going to get more? Then why o’ why do two of the main characters unload their last 4-5 shots into a group of harmless baddies that have gotten stuck in the basement of the farmhouse, when there are plenty of armed baddies still outside? Have they never played Resident Evil before? Conserve your damn ammo or you’re dead! At the same time, maybe they are aware of the importance of ammo, at least if they were it would explain why the main characters never miss a shot with their guns! One maddening scene in particular has a feverish Cory Hardrict seeing in blurry double vision, yet he still manages to pull off what seems like three head-shots in rapid succession. Add to this a cowardly lead villain that is probably afraid of his own shadow, hence his reluctance to attack the heroes himself, and you have a script that should have been lucky to be considered a first draft.

Finally, I do actually have some good things to day about The Day. The colour palette and set design of the film are appropriately bleak and manage to absorb the viewer into the deserted world. Also, the action at the finale is quite good and shows what the special effects crew and Aarniokoski are capable of. It is unfortunate that they waited until the end as it may have made the script more tolerable if these accomplished action scenes and effects were scattered throughout the film.

If you are a fan of post-apocalyptic films then you may enjoy The Day. In particular fans who vehemently defend post-apocalyptic films, while being impervious to reason and other points of view should love it. If on the other hand you merely dabble in post-apocalyptic films, like myself, then steer clear of this one and go watch Road Warrior or play Fallout 3 to get your fix.

Advertisements

About entertainmentmaven

A connoisseur of entertainment, whether it be books, movies, video games, food, drink or anything else that can fall into the category.

2 comments on “The Day – Post-apocalyptic action from Douglas Aarniokoski

  1. I think it’s really irresponsible of you to place blame on a screenwriter like that. I work in the industry and can tell you that no writer ever has control over the end result. Profanity and cliche takes on characters are often added by the actors and portrayal choices–or pushed by a producer or director with their own random vision. I’ve had some of my own work bastardized by the film making process … and trust me, no one gives a FUCK what the writer thinks at the end of the day (pun intended). It’s fine if you don’t like a movie–just be aware that it’s dangerous to presume who is responsible for what. These days most writers are just grateful someone is buying their script … and know full well they won’t have any creative control. Just food for thought. You can call an actor out for phoning it in … but you have zero idea what that script was like in written form–before a dozen people with different vested interests got their hands on it.

    • Someone who’d know, thanks for taking the time to comment, I haven’t been getting very many.

      I appreciate where you are coming from and understand that writers get shafted most of the time, I’m an aspiring writer myself. However, I think it is unfair to say that just because I don’t have first hand knowledge of the transformations the script went through, that I cannot call out someone’s credited script. In the end, if a screenwriter is ok with putting their name on a finished product, then they must bear the brunt of the criticism when it comes to the script. If this is not true, then it means that screenwriters are completely immune to criticism, because we can never be certain what they were or were not responsible for.

      I hope that Luke Passmore bounces back. If he was responsible for the beginning scenes (which I praised), then I’m sure he will.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: